{"id":2221,"date":"2024-09-12T21:50:13","date_gmt":"2024-09-12T21:50:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blueskykentucky.com\/?p=2221"},"modified":"2024-09-13T09:51:23","modified_gmt":"2024-09-13T09:51:23","slug":"fyodor-lukyanov-western-elites-could-be-about-to-get-a-taste-of-their-own-color-revolution-medicine","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/blueskykentucky.com\/index.php\/2024\/09\/12\/fyodor-lukyanov-western-elites-could-be-about-to-get-a-taste-of-their-own-color-revolution-medicine\/","title":{"rendered":"Fyodor Lukyanov: Western elites could be about to get a taste of their own \u2018color revolution\u2019 medicine"},"content":{"rendered":"
The US and Western European establishment know how to interfere and influence elections abroad, which is why they fear what\u2019s happening now<\/strong><\/p>\n There’s a reason why 2024 has been called the year of the big elections. More than half of the world’s population will be called to the ballot boxes, but this time it goes deeper than normal. Voting has always been important, of course, but in calmer – or rather more orderly – times, not every election was considered crucial. Now, on the contrary, consequential elections are routine. Almost every contest is capable of shaking up, if not changing, the course of events. And it’s not just about who wins. More important is the sense of legitimacy, and the recognition by citizens that the results themselves are legitimate.<\/p>\n This should be a well-established, self-evident truth. Firstly, it has always been the case, and secondly, political institutions exist to ensure it. The era of rule by force alone is long gone, and even openly authoritarian regimes have to take account of the interests and demands of the population. And entrenched democracies have to find sophisticated ways to maintain stability and continuity in the face of mistrust of procedures.<\/p>\n Twenty years ago, one of the dominant trends was ‘promoting democracy’. The policy of the neo-conservative US administration (George W. Bush and Dick Cheney) was based on the ideological postulate that the spread of the democratic form of government around the world is the most reliable guarantee not only of the national interests of the US, but also of a positive universal order. They felt that one was inseparable from the other.<\/p>\n The range of tools they had was wide: From actively supporting certain social processes (color revolutions – which raged from the post-Soviet space to the Middle East and North Africa) to direct military intervention to effect regime change (from the Balkans to the Middle East again). Whether Washington wanted it or not, democracy became a political and economic tool for external rather than internal use. The notion of the fundamental importance of having elections recognized by an external arbiter – with the right to certify the result – was what emerged. And if that arbiter wasn’t happy with the outcome, it empowered itself to demand a revision, even by force. <\/p>\n \n Read more<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n